Taxpayer loses child benefit charge row in unusual circumstances
The First Tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal involving a divorced taxpayer who left the family home but continued to be liable for the high-income child benefit charge, but with some unusual circumstances. What happened?
Mr Meades (M) and his first wife had a child in 2012, but separated in July 2017 and divorced on 4 April 2019. During the 2019/20 tax year, M married his second wife, whom he lived with for the entire tax year. The divorced couple had received child benefit throughout - the amount being paid into M's first wife's account. HMRC assessed additional tax of £1,076 for Mr M in 2019/20, on the basis that the high income child benefit charge was due for the year. He appealed on the basis that he and his first wife were not partners per the legislation.
Unfortunately for M, he had made the original application in his name. Even though he had never received any of it and the child mainly lived with his ex-wife, the claim was still in his name. The appeal was dismissed.
The better thing to do would have been for M's ex-wife to take over the claim. She could then continue to receive the payments with no charge on M.
Related Topics
-
Electronic VAT return and payment due
-
Will your employment allowance run out?
Although you have thus far avoided the employers’ NI hike thanks to the employment allowance, you could be hit with a cash-flow crisis if it’s exhausted before 5 April. What can you do about it?
-
How much VAT should you charge on festive goods?
Your business makes and sells goods that are specifically designed for the Christmas trading period and you are preparing for the busy season. What are the VAT issues to consider so that you declare the correct amount of VAT on your returns?